<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Aletheia Forum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pluralism.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pluralism.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Conversations About Truth and Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Claiming Charles Darwin: Confessions of a Christian by The Creation and Evolution Debate &#124; Stock Market News - Business &#38; Tech News</title>
		<link>http://pluralism.wordpress.com/2009/03/04/claiming-charles-darwin-confessions-of-a-christian/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>The Creation and Evolution Debate &#124; Stock Market News - Business &#38; Tech News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pluralism.wordpress.com/?p=41#comment-138</guid>
		<description>[...] editorial was orginally published on the Aletheia Forum.   Filed under Religion, Science Tags:creation against evolution, creation theory, creation vs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] editorial was orginally published on the Aletheia Forum.   Filed under Religion, Science Tags:creation against evolution, creation theory, creation vs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Forgiveness: The Moral Conundrum of the Economic Bailout by Business Ethics and Financial Morality &#124; Stock Market News - Business &#38; Tech News</title>
		<link>http://pluralism.wordpress.com/2008/11/12/forgiveness-the-moral-conundrum-of-the-economic-bailout/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Business Ethics and Financial Morality &#124; Stock Market News - Business &#38; Tech News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 04:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pluralism.wordpress.com/?p=39#comment-136</guid>
		<description>[...] editorial was originally posted on the Aletheia Forum.   Filed under Business, Financial, Politics, Religion Tags:business ethics, business ethics case [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] editorial was originally posted on the Aletheia Forum.   Filed under Business, Financial, Politics, Religion Tags:business ethics, business ethics case [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Do Buddhists Do the Problem of Evil? by Keli</title>
		<link>http://pluralism.wordpress.com/2008/02/28/how-do-buddhists-do-the-problem-of-evil/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Keli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pluralism.wordpress.com/?p=30#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Hey,

 I enjoyed your writing and found it to be very helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,</p>
<p> I enjoyed your writing and found it to be very helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Do Buddhists Do the Problem of Evil? by john smith</title>
		<link>http://pluralism.wordpress.com/2008/02/28/how-do-buddhists-do-the-problem-of-evil/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>john smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pluralism.wordpress.com/?p=30#comment-106</guid>
		<description>hi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Do Buddhists Do the Problem of Evil? by john smith</title>
		<link>http://pluralism.wordpress.com/2008/02/28/how-do-buddhists-do-the-problem-of-evil/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>john smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pluralism.wordpress.com/?p=30#comment-105</guid>
		<description>very good arguments</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very good arguments</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Do Buddhists Do the Problem of Evil? by Donald Sheldon</title>
		<link>http://pluralism.wordpress.com/2008/02/28/how-do-buddhists-do-the-problem-of-evil/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Sheldon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pluralism.wordpress.com/?p=30#comment-104</guid>
		<description>Well written and very enlightening. I am a member of a discussion group called Socrates Cafe that meets weekly at Science of the Mind in Boca Raton Florida. Your arguments will be part of our next meeting. 
Thanks

Donald Sheldon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well written and very enlightening. I am a member of a discussion group called Socrates Cafe that meets weekly at Science of the Mind in Boca Raton Florida. Your arguments will be part of our next meeting.<br />
Thanks</p>
<p>Donald Sheldon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Death&#8217;s Sting of a Young Life:  A Fumbled Promise of God? by knbdiuqo ognmayvb</title>
		<link>http://pluralism.wordpress.com/2008/06/22/deaths-sting-of-a-young-life-a-fumbled-promise-of-god/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>knbdiuqo ognmayvb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 21:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pluralism.wordpress.com/?p=33#comment-103</guid>
		<description>pmabzxjeo fbzgo ermcqdsi jhod bkahwis xsvhkl kyexmr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pmabzxjeo fbzgo ermcqdsi jhod bkahwis xsvhkl kyexmr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Neal Visser</title>
		<link>http://pluralism.wordpress.com/about/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Neal Visser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pluralism.wordpress.com/?page_id=17#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Hi -
You&#039;ve got a couple of typos on the About page.  Now I&#039;ve only been at FBC for two years, but I&#039;m pretty sure it&#039;s not &quot;First Baptish Chruch&quot;.
Neal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi -<br />
You&#8217;ve got a couple of typos on the About page.  Now I&#8217;ve only been at FBC for two years, but I&#8217;m pretty sure it&#8217;s not &#8220;First Baptish Chruch&#8221;.<br />
Neal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Death&#8217;s Sting of a Young Life:  A Fumbled Promise of God? by Rachel</title>
		<link>http://pluralism.wordpress.com/2008/06/22/deaths-sting-of-a-young-life-a-fumbled-promise-of-god/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 03:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pluralism.wordpress.com/?p=33#comment-100</guid>
		<description>This is really great. It speaks well to Josh&#039;s life. Thank you for putting this up, I read it over and over. He is dearly missed. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really great. It speaks well to Josh&#8217;s life. Thank you for putting this up, I read it over and over. He is dearly missed. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Do Buddhists Do the Problem of Evil? by Optagon</title>
		<link>http://pluralism.wordpress.com/2008/02/28/how-do-buddhists-do-the-problem-of-evil/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Optagon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 03:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pluralism.wordpress.com/?p=30#comment-99</guid>
		<description>http://optagon.page.tl/Did-The-Buddha-believe-in-God-f-.htm

…within Buddhism,  in  the  most  famous  of  its  scriptures,  the Dhammapada(47), the  Buddha clearly espouses a belief in a supreme Creator. Buddha,  contrary  to  being  an  atheist  or  a  person  who  never  answered  or avoided    answering    the  question  of  God’s  existence,  as  present  day Buddhist sects and most Western and Eastern scholars portray, also believed in One God:

        Who   is   capable   of   praising   one    like    a   coin  of  finest
        gold,  one  whom  the  knowing  praise  after  finding  him
        impeccable, controlled,  intelligent,  insightful,  ethical,  and
        composed day in and day out? Even the gods(48) praise such
        a one, even the Creator [brahmuna] (17:9,10).(49)

In  the   Sutta-Pitaka  which  is  part of the Tripitaka texts,  translated by T.W .  R.  Davids  of  the  Buddhist  Pali  Text  Society,  the  Buddha  has categorically  stated,  in the Tevigga  Sutta,   that he  had  a  relationship  with  the Creator  and  they  should  listen to  him  and  follow  his  ways ,  since  they  too want to know how to relate to the Creator.

        …to  the  Tathagat  [the  fully  enlightened  person]  when
        asked  touching  the  path  which  leads  to  the  world  of
        Brahma  [the  Creator],  there  can  be  neither  doubt nor
        difficulty.  For  Brahma  I  [do]  know  Vashetta  [the young
        Brahmin  the  Buddha  was  addressing],  and  the  world of
        Brahma and the path that leads to it. Yes, I know it ever as one
        who has entered the Brahma world, and has been born within
        it!(50)


To  paraphrase, Buddha is saying that: “Vashetta, I know, as an enlightened person  that the path to God has certainty and is  easy. I know God and the path that leads to God, since I am part of God’s creation.” Buddha also believed in hell, a paradisiacal state in the next life, and the accountability of deeds in the hereafter:


        One  who  speaks  untruth  goes  to  hell,  as  does  one 
        who claims  not  to  have  done  what  he  has  in  fact  done.             
        Both become  equal  after  death,  people  of  base  deeds  in 
        the hereafter. (22:1)

        When a person long absent from home returns safely
        from afar, relatives, friends, and well-wishers rejoice at his
        return. In  the  same  way,  when  one  who  has  done  good 
        is gone from this world to the beyond, his good deeds receive
        him, like relatives receiving a returning loved one. (16:11, 12)

 

In the book  Outline  of  Mahayana   (Chapter IX) D.T.  Suzuki  explains  that God is referred to by the term Dharmakaya-Buddha or the religious object of Buddhism. In fact in a Tibetan  text, the Dharmakaya is  described with eight  attributes, which  are: Sameness,  Depth, Everlastingness,  Oneness, Harmony, Purity, Radiance, and Enjoyment [some of which are explained as]:

 

       Sameness, because the Dharmakayas of all Buddhas are
       not  different.
       Depth, because it is ineffable.
       Everlastingness, becaus e it has no beginning or end.
       Oneness, because the Dharmadhatu (Absolute Reality)
       and Transcendent Awareness (are not different).
       Harmony, because it is  beyond positive and negative poles.
       Purity, because it is free from the three taints of hatred, greed,
       and delusion.
       Possessing enjoyment, because with its wealth of qualities
       it is the basis of all enjoyment.(51)

 

Suzuki  elaborates  that  “The  Dharmakaya  assumes  three  essential aspects: intelligence (prajna), love (karuna) and will (pranidhanabala).” In fact, Professor Robert F. Thurman, Columbia University, who is  also a Buddhist monk,  passionately emphasizes that: “Buddha not only believed  in God, he knew God. There were numerous atheists in Buddha’s  time  – the Charvaka materialists –   and  the  Buddha  specifically   critiqued  their  lack  of  belief in    any      spiritual  reality.”(52) In    a    chapter    entitled:      “The      Differing  Viewpoints of Buddhism and the Other World Religions regarding Ultimate Reality” William Stoddart, in his book, Outline of Buddhism,  explains  that  the true    Buddhist  belief    is  really  theistic,  but  that  the  existence  of  Ultimate Reality  (i.e.  God)  who  is  both  immanent  and  transcendent,  has  been misunderstood because  of the emphasis  of the  immanence component.   In fact,    Thurman    emphasizes  that  Islam  clearly  depicts  the  physical inconceivability  of  God,  in  that  there  is  nothing  like  God  and  that Buddhism,  if understood correctly,  has one and the same goal. It  is easy to see how the emphasis of the Buddha on the non-corporeality of God has led to many erroneously believing that there is no God in Buddhism.

47. Thomas Cleary (Translator), (1995), Dhammapada: The
       Sayings of Buddha.

48. Deva in the original Pali; this likely refers to the created angels
       or the good spirit entities.

49. Thomas Cleary (Translator), (1995), Dhammapada: The
       Sayings of Buddha.

50.  Muller, F. Max, (1881),  The Sacred Books of the East, p. 186.

51.  Guenther, Herbet (Translator), (1970), The Jewel Ornament of
        Liberation, p.264-5.
       http://www.kheper.net/topics/Buddhism/dharmakaya.htm

52.   Henry,  Gray  (Editor),  (1997),  Islam  in  Tibet  and  the 
         Illustrated  Narrative: Tibetan Caravans,pp. 35-37.

http://optagon.page.tl/Did-The-Buddha-believe-in-God-f-.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://optagon.page.tl/Did-The-Buddha-believe-in-God-f-.htm" rel="nofollow">http://optagon.page.tl/Did-The-Buddha-believe-in-God-f-.htm</a></p>
<p>…within Buddhism,  in  the  most  famous  of  its  scriptures,  the Dhammapada(47), the  Buddha clearly espouses a belief in a supreme Creator. Buddha,  contrary  to  being  an  atheist  or  a  person  who  never  answered  or avoided    answering    the  question  of  God’s  existence,  as  present  day Buddhist sects and most Western and Eastern scholars portray, also believed in One God:</p>
<p>        Who   is   capable   of   praising   one    like    a   coin  of  finest<br />
        gold,  one  whom  the  knowing  praise  after  finding  him<br />
        impeccable, controlled,  intelligent,  insightful,  ethical,  and<br />
        composed day in and day out? Even the gods(48) praise such<br />
        a one, even the Creator [brahmuna] (17:9,10).(49)</p>
<p>In  the   Sutta-Pitaka  which  is  part of the Tripitaka texts,  translated by T.W .  R.  Davids  of  the  Buddhist  Pali  Text  Society,  the  Buddha  has categorically  stated,  in the Tevigga  Sutta,   that he  had  a  relationship  with  the Creator  and  they  should  listen to  him  and  follow  his  ways ,  since  they  too want to know how to relate to the Creator.</p>
<p>        …to  the  Tathagat  [the  fully  enlightened  person]  when<br />
        asked  touching  the  path  which  leads  to  the  world  of<br />
        Brahma  [the  Creator],  there  can  be  neither  doubt nor<br />
        difficulty.  For  Brahma  I  [do]  know  Vashetta  [the young<br />
        Brahmin  the  Buddha  was  addressing],  and  the  world of<br />
        Brahma and the path that leads to it. Yes, I know it ever as one<br />
        who has entered the Brahma world, and has been born within<br />
        it!(50)</p>
<p>To  paraphrase, Buddha is saying that: “Vashetta, I know, as an enlightened person  that the path to God has certainty and is  easy. I know God and the path that leads to God, since I am part of God’s creation.” Buddha also believed in hell, a paradisiacal state in the next life, and the accountability of deeds in the hereafter:</p>
<p>        One  who  speaks  untruth  goes  to  hell,  as  does  one<br />
        who claims  not  to  have  done  what  he  has  in  fact  done.<br />
        Both become  equal  after  death,  people  of  base  deeds  in<br />
        the hereafter. (22:1)</p>
<p>        When a person long absent from home returns safely<br />
        from afar, relatives, friends, and well-wishers rejoice at his<br />
        return. In  the  same  way,  when  one  who  has  done  good<br />
        is gone from this world to the beyond, his good deeds receive<br />
        him, like relatives receiving a returning loved one. (16:11, 12)</p>
<p>In the book  Outline  of  Mahayana   (Chapter IX) D.T.  Suzuki  explains  that God is referred to by the term Dharmakaya-Buddha or the religious object of Buddhism. In fact in a Tibetan  text, the Dharmakaya is  described with eight  attributes, which  are: Sameness,  Depth, Everlastingness,  Oneness, Harmony, Purity, Radiance, and Enjoyment [some of which are explained as]:</p>
<p>       Sameness, because the Dharmakayas of all Buddhas are<br />
       not  different.<br />
       Depth, because it is ineffable.<br />
       Everlastingness, becaus e it has no beginning or end.<br />
       Oneness, because the Dharmadhatu (Absolute Reality)<br />
       and Transcendent Awareness (are not different).<br />
       Harmony, because it is  beyond positive and negative poles.<br />
       Purity, because it is free from the three taints of hatred, greed,<br />
       and delusion.<br />
       Possessing enjoyment, because with its wealth of qualities<br />
       it is the basis of all enjoyment.(51)</p>
<p>Suzuki  elaborates  that  “The  Dharmakaya  assumes  three  essential aspects: intelligence (prajna), love (karuna) and will (pranidhanabala).” In fact, Professor Robert F. Thurman, Columbia University, who is  also a Buddhist monk,  passionately emphasizes that: “Buddha not only believed  in God, he knew God. There were numerous atheists in Buddha’s  time  – the Charvaka materialists –   and  the  Buddha  specifically   critiqued  their  lack  of  belief in    any      spiritual  reality.”(52) In    a    chapter    entitled:      “The      Differing  Viewpoints of Buddhism and the Other World Religions regarding Ultimate Reality” William Stoddart, in his book, Outline of Buddhism,  explains  that  the true    Buddhist  belief    is  really  theistic,  but  that  the  existence  of  Ultimate Reality  (i.e.  God)  who  is  both  immanent  and  transcendent,  has  been misunderstood because  of the emphasis  of the  immanence component.   In fact,    Thurman    emphasizes  that  Islam  clearly  depicts  the  physical inconceivability  of  God,  in  that  there  is  nothing  like  God  and  that Buddhism,  if understood correctly,  has one and the same goal. It  is easy to see how the emphasis of the Buddha on the non-corporeality of God has led to many erroneously believing that there is no God in Buddhism.</p>
<p>47. Thomas Cleary (Translator), (1995), Dhammapada: The<br />
       Sayings of Buddha.</p>
<p>48. Deva in the original Pali; this likely refers to the created angels<br />
       or the good spirit entities.</p>
<p>49. Thomas Cleary (Translator), (1995), Dhammapada: The<br />
       Sayings of Buddha.</p>
<p>50.  Muller, F. Max, (1881),  The Sacred Books of the East, p. 186.</p>
<p>51.  Guenther, Herbet (Translator), (1970), The Jewel Ornament of<br />
        Liberation, p.264-5.<br />
       <a href="http://www.kheper.net/topics/Buddhism/dharmakaya.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.kheper.net/topics/Buddhism/dharmakaya.htm</a></p>
<p>52.   Henry,  Gray  (Editor),  (1997),  Islam  in  Tibet  and  the<br />
         Illustrated  Narrative: Tibetan Caravans,pp. 35-37.</p>
<p><a href="http://optagon.page.tl/Did-The-Buddha-believe-in-God-f-.htm" rel="nofollow">http://optagon.page.tl/Did-The-Buddha-believe-in-God-f-.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
